Comments on: Benefits http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/ 42 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:05:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Credit Analyst http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-34696 Credit Analyst Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:14:59 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-34696 Matter of money always seems quite string in these things. But of course the police sometimes forgets to consider another reason. Matter of money always seems quite string in these things. But of course the police sometimes forgets to consider another reason.

]]> By: Chewxy http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1767 Chewxy Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:03:41 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1767 To each his own... I find observing more interesting than actually participating XD To each his own… I find observing more interesting than actually participating XD

]]> By: cfgt http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1763 cfgt Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:39:27 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1763 <blockquote>Besides, I should act like a spectre, or some invisible, ethereal being… you know… Observer of All Mankind and Holder of All Time… that sort of thing.</blockquote> Been there, done that - trust me, it's not as fun as you think. :P

Besides, I should act like a spectre, or some invisible, ethereal being… you know… Observer of All Mankind and Holder of All Time… that sort of thing.

Been there, done that - trust me, it’s not as fun as you think. :P

]]> By: Chewxy http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1627 Chewxy Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:57:54 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1627 Shouldn't <em>you</em> be the one calculating the probabilities of that happening? Besides, I should act like a spectre, or some invisible, ethereal being... you know... Observer of All Mankind and Holder of All Time... that sort of thing. Shouldn’t you be the one calculating the probabilities of that happening?

Besides, I should act like a spectre, or some invisible, ethereal being… you know… Observer of All Mankind and Holder of All Time… that sort of thing.

]]> By: cfgt http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1626 cfgt Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:25:02 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1626 Just out of hilarity - what about if you killed that man? :D Just out of hilarity - what about if you killed that man? :D

]]> By: Chewxy http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1608 Chewxy Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:05:39 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1608 Lol.. that's totally outta the box. No more confined within the box of rational-irrational. Just probabilities. Because there is always a probability that someone turns invisible. :D Lol.. that’s totally outta the box. No more confined within the box of rational-irrational. Just probabilities. Because there is always a probability that someone turns invisible. :D

]]> By: The Princess http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1576 The Princess Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:32:14 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1576 Maybe it wasn't his wife nor the street guy? What if human beings are really evolving and someone has mastered the power of invisibility (I've got to stop watching 'Heroes')? Maybe it wasn’t his wife nor the street guy? What if human beings are really evolving and someone has mastered the power of invisibility (I’ve got to stop watching ‘Heroes’)?

]]> By: Chewxy http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1574 Chewxy Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:18:23 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1574 More random rational-irrational illustrations: If my blog's link suddenly appears in Freakonomics' or Tim Harford's blogrolls without their knowledge, I'm suspect No.1 ^This is rational thinking, since I have much to gain, it would be an incentive for me to force my way into their blogrolls. If my blog link suddenly appears in some spam sites, and I'm suspect No.1 for doing that ^This, is irrational thinking, since I have much to lose, and it would be an incentive for me to stay away from spam sites, what more add my link to spam sites. More random rational-irrational illustrations:

If my blog’s link suddenly appears in Freakonomics’ or Tim Harford’s blogrolls without their knowledge, I’m suspect No.1
^This is rational thinking, since I have much to gain, it would be an incentive for me to force my way into their blogrolls.

If my blog link suddenly appears in some spam sites, and I’m suspect No.1 for doing that
^This, is irrational thinking, since I have much to lose, and it would be an incentive for me to stay away from spam sites, what more add my link to spam sites.

]]> By: abel http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1573 abel Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:54:33 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1573 i believe in a vague instance as this, there isn't a 'rational' thought because both thoughts have no solid foundation/proof. They're merely speculations based on personal logic (which differs from individual to individual). You cannot rationalize anything unless there is a degree of certainty or a definite sense that one choice is better than the other. To me, although i also agree the first thought could seem more 'rational', as long as both thoughts are possible, there isn't a right answer. nice post! i believe in a vague instance as this, there isn’t a ‘rational’ thought because both thoughts have no solid foundation/proof. They’re merely speculations based on personal logic (which differs from individual to individual). You cannot rationalize anything unless there is a degree of certainty or a definite sense that one choice is better than the other.

To me, although i also agree the first thought could seem more ‘rational’, as long as both thoughts are possible, there isn’t a right answer.

nice post!

]]> By: Chewxy http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1571 Chewxy Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:45:34 +0000 http://blog.chewxy.com/2007/02/11/benefits/#comment-1571 I fixed it... comments? I fixed it… comments?

]]>